Satyajit Ray’s Documentary Film “Rabindranath” : A Saga of Creative Excellence
Satyajit’s Ray ‘s documentary film ‘Rabindranath’ was a saga of creative excellence. Its wide range of coneption is simply amazing. It is something more profound than a mere documentary.
In his poem Matthew Arnold once paid his tribute to Shakespeare in theever inimitable words : “Others abide our question. Thou art free./Weask and ask: Thou smilest and art still,/Out-topping knowledge.” Thisis equally true of Satyajit Ray who seemed to say in his documentary film ‘Rabindranath’ : “We ask and ask and Tagore smiles and is ‘stillout-topping knowledge’. In 1623 the great Shakespearean editors did their fantastic job of publishing in the Folio edition posthumouslythe 36 out of the 37 plays . Almost comparable to this outstanding
editing venture is the task undertaken by Satyajit Ray FASC (Film andStudy Center) to develop its most comprehensive archive on the worksof Satyajit Ray. The total number of films like Shakespeare’s dramasis 37. ‘Rabindranath’, the 54 min B/W documentary film directed by
Satyajit Ray was a saga of creative excellence for its wide range of conception .Tagore is revered by the world’s 250 million Bengalispeakers in India and neighbouring Bangladesh . Celebrations had begunall over the world to mark the 150th anniversary of the birth of
iconic poet and playwright Rabindranath Tagore, the first Asian to winthe Nobel Prize for literature in 1913. The year 2011 is special sinceit marks the 150th anniversary of Tagore’s birth. The documentary wasmade to celebrate Tagore’s birth centenary in May 1961.In that sense,
the documentary on Tagore also has its golden jubilee to celebrateas it has passed fifty years after its production. Ray was conscious that he was making an official portrait of India’s ever celebrated poet and hence the film does not include any controversial aspects of
Tagore’s life. In making the film , he pries into every aspect of his production. Ray's eye for detail and the old magic of his genius does not let go of the documentary, a tour-de-force. The camera is wielded like a conductor's baton as it strikes chords deep in the mind. In a serene, classical style the documentary progresses and we can still hear in its message the voice of a great artist who had been again and again applauded by Kurosawa or James Ivory or Huston.
In his book, Our Films, Their Films, Ray wrote that Calcutta was far removed from the hub of things. Ray had evidently learnt more from Henri Cartier-Bresson than just a fetish for available-lightphotography. But even here too he excelled in taking the snapshots like an artist,.He seems to have painted his picture with the right brush on the easel.However, it is far from being a propaganda film like ‘Sikkim’ which sparked off huge amount of controversies . It is
perfect as an work of art as well in its music and visual graphic.Films Division of India holds 8000 titles on Documentaries, Short Films and Animation Films in its archives. These films range
from events of Socio-cultural importance to political events. Since October 1993, Ray FASC has taken small steps to help correct this cultural loss. It has helped establish The Society for the
Preservation of Satyajit Ray Films .The Ray Society, has arranged for the screening of the documentary on Tagore’s life..The film won in 1961 President’s Gold Medal in New Delhi and Golden Seal at Locarno. .It was specially mentioned in Montevideo in 1962..Very few
documentaries can claim this kind of distinction. Akira Kurosawa,perhaps the greatest of Ray’s admirers among his fellow directors,told W. Robinson : “Mr Ray is a wonderful and respectful man. I feel that he is a ‘giant’ of the movie industry.”(The Times , Aug 18 ,2005)
The documentary film ‘Rabindranath’ ‘comprises dramatized episodes from the poet’s life and archived images and documents.Ray himself wasproud of the delineation of the boyhood days of Tagore , the most moving and lyrical part indeed : “Ten or twelve minutes of it are
among the most moving and powerful things that I have produced” Shaw is said to have commented in his friend circle. The other parts of the documentary are no less mesmerizing, especially the part where Tagore had accompanied his father in the North India tour .This
journey by train with his father was an outstanding picturisation of the two great souls communicating with each other thus throwing light on the secret influences the spiritual thoughts of Tagore which were to to bloom as flowers in his later life. Dulal Dutta is simply unique
in editing, and Bansi Chandragupta in his Art Direction and Soumendu Ray in cinematography have given the Documentary an incredible height of excellence. . Ray himself completed the script and directed the film and also excels in writing commentaries which are examples of
lucid and yet dignified expression.Ray gradually moves towards the climax and goes in an epic style to narrate the detached episodes of his life. Ray focuses on variousactivities of Tagore. The object of Tagore’s visit to England was to understand the education of the West. In Santiniketan, his motto was rural welfare . It was to make the world smaller that he envisioned the setting up of a new university of the most untraditional character. Ray discussed how the translation of Gitanjali got the final shape and won him the Nobel prize. Tagore was all praise for Rothenstein and W.B.Yeats.. Tagore was shocked at the degradation of human beings and in a tone of vehement denouncement and protest,he returned his knighthood title. He was one of the great signatories such as Jagadish Chandra Bose, Romain Rolland , Einstein and Gandhi
and signing in favour of the World peace. The only controversial thing if any in the documentary relates to the Gandhi –Tagore relationship which has been highlighted in the film . Gandhi and Tagore ,in spite of their greater differences on many socio-political issues, with their deeper affinities on other levels were able to transcend all occasional barriers.The call of duty was of
greater importance to Tagore than looking after his own broken health. The man who loved freedom all through his life wrote the song which Ray beautifully used in the film as a playback: ‘Amar mukti aloi aloi ei akashe‘ .In the depiction of the last years of Tagore’s life Ray took all care as a director and as a writer of commentaries which comprises all the outstanding watersheds of activities and literary milestones of his life. Tagore’s ever wandering soul was restless. He never stayed in the same room or same house at Santiniketan. This restlessness reflects the ever liveliness of the young mind of Tagore who composed along with his sublime lines , the nonsense rhymes for the children. He had in himself a child. Ray has avoided detailing
this aspect in the documentary. The film ends with Tagore’s song sung in his own voice : “ Mone rekho …” which was interspersed I the film with many scenes of his later life till his passing away in 1941.As Shakespeare had returned for the last four years to his native home in Stratford on Avon , so did Tagore left Santiniketan not to return there again as he preferred to live the last days of his life at his Jorasanko house where the boy Tagore roamed on the corridor looking
outside casting his poetic glance on the open blue sky. Even at this senile stage of his life when he was eighty ,the poet possessing a heroic soul registered his voice of protest against Fascism. He mourned the crumbling ruins of the European civilization although he never stopped hoping a ‘ new dawn’ in the spirit of his beloved poet Shelley who also dreamt of the ‘New Millennium’ after the Reign of Terror following the French Revolution . He composed his last message
for the world in which he vehemently criticized the barbaric aggression against the East by Europe. He was shocked to see this barbaric face of the civilised (erstwhile) Europe which he himself saw in its human contours.The display of Tagore’s handwritten copies
of poems during this part of the film and his golden voice beaming with hope add a multiple dimensions to the audio- visual effect. He mourned that the crumbling civilization stood like a vast heap offutility. Yet Tagore did not lose faith in man. Andrew Robinson regarded Rabindranath Tagore: as the ‘Myriad-minded Man’ and this is the main thrust in Ray’s film script. Like the five Satyajit Ray films , Charulata (1964) The Music Room (1958) Pather Panchali (1955) and
Days and Nights in the Forest (1969) The Chess Players (1977), the documentary should not be missed. This is how Ray raised the documentary to such a height which even a very few films can claim. Ray’s friend James Ivory watched Pather Panchali in the USA in the
late 1950s and remarked that it literally changed his life and it set him on the road to directing films in India, and then in the West. Satyajit Ray and John Huston, the larger-than-life director of The Maltese Falcon and Moby Dick, had much in common. But Huston himself wrote: “I recognised the footage as the work of a great film-maker. I liked Ray enormously on first encounter. Everything he did and said supported my feelings on viewing the film.” (Times, 2005) Raya Chatterjee, Sovanlal Ganguli, Smaran Ghosal, Purnendu Mukherjee,
Kallol Bose, Subir Bose, Phani Nan, Norman Ellis have made the documentary vivid by their powerful acting. The dawn will come from the East where the sun rise with the promise
to be fulfilled about the unvanquished man leaves surmounting all barriers to win back his lost heritage. The film ends with the horizons being resonant with the melodious chorus singing “ Oi
mahamanab ashe / Dike dike romanco jage…”. Akira Kurosawa remarked about Satyajit Ray’s first film, Pather Panchali (The Song of the Little Road). “ I can never forget the
excitement in my mind after seeing it.” (Robinson:The Inner Eye 45) This is the real feeling of the audience after seeing all his films.
and even the documentary film ‘Rabindranath’ deserves mention in its
impact. It is always more important for Satyajit Ray to do even the
smaller things with a great care whatever it may be - a documentary
or a film.
Monday, November 7, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Tata's hostility to Mamata Govt will impede industrial growth
IN THE 1970s the Left targeted Tata as one of the biggest capitalist houses of India. In 2010, the Left became friends with Tata for developing industries. The Tata group even advertised in favour of the Left and embittered relations with Mamata Banerjee and her party, which at that time launched a violent agitation against the Left Front government and Tata Motors. At that time the issue was Singur.
The Tata group shifted their Nano industry to Gujarat without delaying the move even by a day for the sake of the Left Front government. The incidents that followed are known to everyone. The Tata group, however, kept their grip on Singur land and created impediments in distributing the land to unwilling farmers. The issue is now before the Calcutta High Court. It is quite significant that only recently the Tata babus (as the CM ironically addresses them) have given a fresh proposal for investment in the state.
Tata group wants to ensure that there is no hostility towards them especially when the state Chief Minister is in favour of pursuing them to court. Earlier Mamata Banerjee had been irked by Tata’s partiality towards CPI(M) and today she is determined to take back the land lease to Tata.
In the annual general meeting on August 30 in Kolkata, Tata was responding to a volley of questions and reiterated his love for West Bengal: “We had a fondness for the people of Bengal,” said Ratan Tata, the chief of the Tata Groups. Very recently Tata spent nearly Rs. 300 crores on Cancer Research hospital at Rajarhat. It was also an initiative of the Left Front government. It is not sure if rapprochement is possible between Tata Motors and the state government as the matter is sub judice.
The very point of ‘hostility if any existing’ has sparked off controversies. Thus, it is clear that time is still far ahead for the ice to melt. Faith and trust are yet to be restored. The Tatas, if they at all want to invest in the state for which they claim to have fondness, should not say such words of distrust and rancour.
There should be an atmosphere of amity and good will for the industrialization in the state. Both Tata and the state will be the beneficiaries of such a compromise. Antagonism cannot breed good results for either. Mamata has made it clear in the manifesto that if her party comes to power she will return the land to unwilling farmers. It is not that Tata will not be able to develop their motor car industry elsewhere in the state. No earthquake will occur if Singur is not chosen as the site for the industry. This is simply a case of obstinacy and lack of good will.
The new government has some compulsions under which it is now acting. Singur was a vital issue during the last assembly elections. To return the land to unwilling farmers has been a major issue. The state government cannot budge an inch from it. Tata should honour this feeling of the government and only then an atmosphere of good will can be created.
Mamata Banerjee has emotionally solved many issues such as Darjeeling or Jangalmahal. She is now trying to solve the Singur issue, but cannot show such emotional broadmindedness to the Tatas. Her movement was against the Tatas. This is a fact which should not be ignored by the Tata group. The way they showed their support for the CPI(M) before the election by giving newspaper ads is enough to reveal that it is the Tatas who harbour ill feelings against the State government. They should come forward first by shedding their one-eyed attitude, return the land to the unwilling farmers and drop the case against the state government so that a new site can be found out for their investment. Undue comments will only add to inimical relations between the Tata and the State government.
The Tata group shifted their Nano industry to Gujarat without delaying the move even by a day for the sake of the Left Front government. The incidents that followed are known to everyone. The Tata group, however, kept their grip on Singur land and created impediments in distributing the land to unwilling farmers. The issue is now before the Calcutta High Court. It is quite significant that only recently the Tata babus (as the CM ironically addresses them) have given a fresh proposal for investment in the state.
Tata group wants to ensure that there is no hostility towards them especially when the state Chief Minister is in favour of pursuing them to court. Earlier Mamata Banerjee had been irked by Tata’s partiality towards CPI(M) and today she is determined to take back the land lease to Tata.
In the annual general meeting on August 30 in Kolkata, Tata was responding to a volley of questions and reiterated his love for West Bengal: “We had a fondness for the people of Bengal,” said Ratan Tata, the chief of the Tata Groups. Very recently Tata spent nearly Rs. 300 crores on Cancer Research hospital at Rajarhat. It was also an initiative of the Left Front government. It is not sure if rapprochement is possible between Tata Motors and the state government as the matter is sub judice.
The very point of ‘hostility if any existing’ has sparked off controversies. Thus, it is clear that time is still far ahead for the ice to melt. Faith and trust are yet to be restored. The Tatas, if they at all want to invest in the state for which they claim to have fondness, should not say such words of distrust and rancour.
There should be an atmosphere of amity and good will for the industrialization in the state. Both Tata and the state will be the beneficiaries of such a compromise. Antagonism cannot breed good results for either. Mamata has made it clear in the manifesto that if her party comes to power she will return the land to unwilling farmers. It is not that Tata will not be able to develop their motor car industry elsewhere in the state. No earthquake will occur if Singur is not chosen as the site for the industry. This is simply a case of obstinacy and lack of good will.
The new government has some compulsions under which it is now acting. Singur was a vital issue during the last assembly elections. To return the land to unwilling farmers has been a major issue. The state government cannot budge an inch from it. Tata should honour this feeling of the government and only then an atmosphere of good will can be created.
Mamata Banerjee has emotionally solved many issues such as Darjeeling or Jangalmahal. She is now trying to solve the Singur issue, but cannot show such emotional broadmindedness to the Tatas. Her movement was against the Tatas. This is a fact which should not be ignored by the Tata group. The way they showed their support for the CPI(M) before the election by giving newspaper ads is enough to reveal that it is the Tatas who harbour ill feelings against the State government. They should come forward first by shedding their one-eyed attitude, return the land to the unwilling farmers and drop the case against the state government so that a new site can be found out for their investment. Undue comments will only add to inimical relations between the Tata and the State government.
Thursday, August 11, 2011
London London Burning Right!
This is a terrible news that teenagers are on the rampage in London.Thousands of Police are posted to control them. They are behaving like hooligans.They demanded jobs and other amenities. Their demands may have justifications but this is not the way that grievance can be redressed. Whom these young people are really targetting is not very clear. The government may be but this has affected general life of the people in Britain. Life is becoming very much insecure and unsafe. In this land of Shakespeare, such uncivilised things can happen , it is really painful even to think. Children are nowadays very much unruly.'Spare the rod , spare a child'- this adage is now very true . Our children are getting uncontrollable. Even for a Cadbury chocolate bar , a child can kill his or her mom. Obedience is gradually disappearing. The more disobedient and unruly the childrn become, the smarter they are in the eyes of the parents. But this kind of pampering will have its consequences. Things are going beyond control. There should be some restraint to be imposed on the children. In a recent Bengali film, Icche the story is told. The mother wanted to make her son one of the best. May be true, that the mother is too much interfering and imposing. But the brilliant son is just spoilt. He protests against his mother's restraints very rudely. He could be an engineer or a doctor or a professor of Oxford as the mother dreamt. But he just spoilt himself. He turned to a mediocore. He got a very petty job. All these he did , only to pressurise and humiliate the mother. He did not sit for exams and he did not study seriously. Whom will he blame later life? He wanted to be a man of flesh and blood, and not to become a robot. But one child can be a man after being fully accomplished. Freedom does never mean anarchy. A child should be kept under control till he gets a strong footing in the real world. Unless a child is not given proper education, there is a possibility of his getting lost.Then this kind of situation prevails. Hooliganism cannot be the answer. First , seek your answer in your own accomplishments. It is not wise to waste time in the golden youth and then turn a hooligan to pressurise parents and the government that there is no job . Jobs may be waiting for them if they are ready to join the jobs. But where is the readiness in the youth? They waste time in nonsense and one is friendship.In the name of friendship , teenagers spoil their life. Love and marriage are natural things and they should occur only when the time is ripe .
Monday, August 8, 2011
Price Hike of Petrol and Gas
Why is the Central Government allowing this price hike in Petrol and Diesel ? Even kerosene or Cooking Gas is not spared from the price hike. This will accelerate the pace of price rise all over the country. The railway, Bus or Airways fare will be automatically increased.
Common people will be affected worstly. But the most painful thing is that prices do not come down when the international market reduces the oil price. Once it is hiked, the oil price goes on rising. This affects the economic stability worstly...
Common people will be affected worstly. But the most painful thing is that prices do not come down when the international market reduces the oil price. Once it is hiked, the oil price goes on rising. This affects the economic stability worstly...
Mediocrity prevails in colleges under WBSU
Colleges of WBSU like Dum Dum Motijheel College, Motijheel Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Sarojini Naidu college, Sarada Ramkrishna Mission College, East Calcutta Girls college and Bidhannagar Govt College - in fact colleges which are in the vicinity of the Kolkata city itself will face more problems as students are trying first for admission in the colleges under Calcutta University. This is expected as the new university WBSU is yet to gain its credibility.The mistakes and errors committed by the university in the Website should be removed. More efficiency should be shown in tackling the administration. Rural and semi urban colleges under the WBSU will not face such problems because students of those localities will take more interest in studying in local colleges. Colleges of Kolkata are suffering after being taken by WBSU.At times these colleges were crowded by better students. Now only the mediocre and the less meritorious students are coming for admission.
Satyjit Ray's documentary 'Rabindranath Tagore'
Satyajit's Ray's documentary is more than a film. In his Rabindranath Tagore he has captured not only the life of the poet, but the rhythm of the time in which Tagore lived.He has delineated so vividly the intellectual milieu in which he was born and brought up. Tagore grew up rather than being brought up. His spirituality, his poetical approach to life and his world vision are all developed slowly. His grandfather , his father and his brothers have all inspired him. In him the ideas of the Tagore family are all assimilated. Ray has beautifully captured the slow process of development. The Film is almost a bildungsroman in audio-visual form...
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Lucy Gray : A Critical Note
Lucy Gray is not one of wordsworth's Lucy poems which were written under the inspiration of Rousseau's Emile. It is rather a traditional form of ballad in which the poet narrates a tragic story of a lonely girl of the moor. She was sent by her father to go on a look out for her mother who went to town. The girl on her way was lost in the snow storm on the moor. The story of Lucy Gray was based on a real incident narrated by Wordsworth. The death of the girl really happened at Halifax.This is not a typical Wordsworthian poem in which Nature is depicted as a source of joy. Here nature is terrible in the form of snowstorm which causes death to an innocent village girl. In the Lucy poems Lucy who was brought up by Nature also died . But her death is not so tragic as that Lucy Gray's. But in Lucy poems Wordsworth feels that Lucy after her death on the heath is not lost. The poet speaks of his own personal belief " O, the difference to me!".Lucy in the poem 'The Education of Nature' after her premature death remains alive in the elements of the heath. Here also the poet more in the spirit of a ballad writing refers to the popular belief that she is alive and is heard singing a solitary song.
Dr Ratan Bhattacharjee (RBSir)
Dr Ratan Bhattacharjee (RBSir)
Labels:
English Romantic Poetry,
Lucy Gray,
Wordsworth
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)